Archive for March, 2009

Craveable Couscous

I had a great vegan dinner tonight . . . or, uh . . . last night. I (mostly) followed the recipe on the back of a box of tomato lentil couscous, by Near East. (Now that I look at it closely, I see that it has honey in it . . . so fail. However, something similar could be replicated by making couscous with sun dried tomatoes, a little celery, and lentils, and adding paprika, garlic, agave to replace the honey, and I believe a little tumeric and parsley- I think I saw something green, but all it says is “spices.”) I cooked up my couscous with vegetable broth instead of water, and it was so flavorful!

The recipe called for a cup of chopped red onions, 1 cup diced zucchini, 1 cup sliced carrots, a can of diced tomatoes, and a can of garbanzo beans. The first three ingredients are sauteed in olive oil for 5 minutes and then the tomatoes and beans added and cooked for another 3ish minutes. Then you serve atop of the couscous.

I was out of garbanzos, so I substituted a can of great northern beans. I also added a teaspoon of fresh, finely diced garlic with the first ingredients. It smelled so good! After spooning over top of my couscous, I crumbled some falafel on top of that. (Fantastic Foods boxed mix- that I know for sure is vegan!) It was fantastic, and I’ll certainly be making it again!

I would have taken a picture had I a digital camera. That in itself is a long story. For another day.

Leave a Comment

A More Stupid Approach, or Four Happy Meat Fails.

So I’m currently sitting here reading an article from the Washington Post that was brought to my attention by my latest vegan blog discovery- Unpopular Vegan Essays. The article is entitled “For Meat-Eating Authors, A More Tender Approach.”

I think you can guess where this is going.

The article is about author Susan Bourette, who, after a dreadful field experience at a pork processing plant (like any experience at a meat processing plant could be pleasant), immediately went vegetarian, and then vegan. She cited as her motivation that she was revolted by “the way the animals were treated, the way the workers were treated, the unavoidable fact that animals died to provide carnivores like her with sustenance.” She lasted five weeks before she “was forced” to revert back to her old ways, because she was “pale as sticky rice, as weak as Scotch broth.”

The obvious is probably clicking in your head right now- she wasn’t doing it right. Now, I’ve probably mentioned how easy it is to eat vegan (and if I haven’t, I likely will), but you have to know a few nutritional basics. (For instance, because vegan food is generally lower in calories, you need to eat more food to get the same amount of calories you would’ve gotten before.) Because she went veg so quickly (and while she was away), it is extremely likely that she didn’t do any research. I myself transitioned to vegetarianism over a period of eight years and to veganism over a period of one or two years. I’m not saying that one timetable for going veg is better than another, but if you take time to get all the nutrition info, you are much more likely to be healthy and successful! (And having had ten years of preparation, I can say for certain that I know my stuff!) She’s not the first one to claim that veganism is unhealthy due to a poorly thought out transition. The least she could’ve done was pick up a copy of Vegetarian Times at the airport on the way home! Fail #1.

At any rate, “Bourette decided to come to terms with her carnivorous ways. If she could understand why she craved meat, she reasoned, perhaps she would get over the guilt of enjoying it.”

Any nutritionist (or doctor) could tell you that she was likely craving meat because she was low on iron (and probably other nutrients as well). Why didn’t she see a nutritionist anyway? If she was really set on the vegan thing, she would’ve made the trip before hastily deciding to dismiss it as unhealthy. Fail #2.

This is when she wrote Meat: A Love Story.

Gag me.

Her book is one of many recent publications promoting  “happy meat,” what omnivores (that’s right- humans are not carnivores- Fail #3) are pushing as a conscience saver. Other books include The Compassionate Carnivore: Or How to Keep Animals Happy, Save Old MacDonald’s Farm, Reduce Your Hoofprint, and Still Eat Meat, by Catherine Friend, and The Shameless Carnivore: A Manifesto for Meat Lovers, by Scott Gold.

These books seek to actually paint the picture that vegetarians have the wrong idea, citing that we are helping “animals at the expense of sustainable farmers.” Perhaps these “sustainable farmers” should focus their efforts on growing soybeans instead of raising meat, or else stop calling themselves sustainable. I suppose that no one told them that “whether cattle are reared organically or with conventional farming methods, the end effect is bad for the environment, according to a new German consumer report.” Fail #4.

Veganism is still the most sustainable choice.

Now, I’m not the biggest fan of PETA’s founder Ingrid Newkirk, but I think she puts it best when she says: “but why are these people so desperate to cling to a really bad habit? This is just guilt deflection. It’s like saying, ‘I’m still going to abuse children, but I’m going to be conscious about it and get them from a small family.’” Win #1!

Comments (1)

Something New to Do With Your Vegetables

Now, as a vegan, I much prefer to EAT my vegetables. However, we can now add making music to the list of things that can be done with vegetables. Who would think of such an idea, you ask? I present you with the Vienna Vegetable Orchestra! http://www.gemueseorchester.org/
Instruments played include:

the Pepper Trumpet

the Leek Violin

the Carrot Recorder

and the “Cucumberphone.”

However, don’t expect the music of Bach, Beethoven, or Mozart to come out of these instruments. The Vegetable Orchestra prefers a much more minimalist sound. (For audio, CD buying information, and video, visit their website.)

Each of the following videos features interviews, close-up views of performances, and behind-the-scenes shots of the vegetable shopping and instrument making. (Unfortunately, the interviews are in German.)

As you can see, some of their music sounds much more like an alien invasion! Some of their tracks sound almost like the slow death of a cat or some other animal . . . (which I don’t condone!)

For more videos, (which, for some reason, I can’t stop watching even though I’m not a fan of their sound) go to YouTube and search for “Vienna Vegetable Orchestra.”

Leave a Comment

The Vegan’s 100

Stolen from http://www.collegevegan.com/the-vegans-hundred/. I had to Google several of these!

The Vegan’s Hundred

Your mission, should you choose to accept it:

1) Copy this list into your own blog, including these instructions.
2) Bold all the items you’ve eaten.
3) Cross out any items that you would never consider eating.
4) Post a comment here once you’ve finished and link your post back to this one.
5) Pass it on!

1. Natto
2. Green Smoothie (I don’t like to drink my vegetables.)
3. Tofu Scramble
4. Haggis
5. Mangosteen (I’ve had it in Snapple and Naked . . . does that count?)
6. Creme brulee
7. Fondue
8. Marmite/Vegemite
9. Borscht (Don’t like beets)
10. Baba ghanoush
11. Nachos
12. Authentic Soba Noodles
13. PB&J sandwich
14. Aloo Gobi
15. Taco from a street cart
16. Boba Tea
17. Black truffle
18. Wine made form something other than grapes
19. Gyoza (a chinese dumpling, but the author used the japanese name)
20. Vanilla ice cream
21. Heirloom tomatoes
22. Fresh wild berries
23. Ceviche
24. Rice and beans
25. Knish
26. Raw scotch bonnet pepper
27. Dulce de leche
28. Caviar
29. Baklava
30. Pate
31. Wasabi peas
32. Chowder in a sourdough bowl
33. Mango lassi
34. Sauerkraut
35. Root beer float
36. Mulled cider
37. Scones with buttery spread and jam
38. Vodka jelly
39. Gumbo
40. Fast food french fries
41. Raw Brownies
42. Fresh Garbanzo Beans
43. Dahl
44. Homemade Soymilk
45. Wine from a bottle worth £60/$120 or more
46. Stroopwafle (These look good!)
47. Samosas
48. Vegetable Sushi
49. Glazed doughnut
50. Seaweed
51. Prickly pear
52. Umeboshi (I think some friends have tried to feed this too me.)
53. Tofurkey
54. Sheese
55. Cotton candy
56. Gnocchi (LOVE IT!)
57. Pina Colada
58. Birch beer
59. Scrapple (Vegan scrapple??? Why veganize one of the nastiest foods known to man?)
60. Carob chips (I like my chocolate, thank you.)
61. S’mores
62. Soy curls
63. Chickpea cutlets
64. Curry (Not a fan.)
65. Durian (strange fruits I have tried: dragon fruit and horned melon)
66. Homemade Sausages
67. Churros, elephant ears, or funnel cake
68. Smoked tofu
69. Fried plantain
70. Mochi
71. Gazpacho
72. Warm chocolate chip cookies
73. Absinthe
74. Corn on the cob
75. Whipped cream, straight from the can
76. Pomegranate (I <3 pomegranates!)
77. Fauxstess Cupcake
78. Mashed potatoes with gravy
79. Jerky
80. Croissants
81. French onion soup

82. Savory crepes
83. Tings
84. A meal at Candle 79 (I was fooled into thinking that I would get to go here last October when I traveled to NYC with my school’s music department. It’s a long story.)
85. Moussaka
86. Sprouted grains or seeds
87. Macaroni and “cheese”
88. Flowers
89. Matzoh ball soup
90. White chocolate
91. Seitan
92. Kimchi
93. Butterscotch chips
94. Yellow watermelon
95. Chili with chocolate
96. Bagel and Tofutti
97. Potato milk (???)
98. Polenta
99. Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee (I refuse to drink coffee. My roommate and my faculty advisor have a bet that I will crack by the end of my college career.)
100. Raw cookie dough

And now I look like a ridiculously picky eater . . .

Leave a Comment

Eco-terrorism Part Four: Are You an Eco-terrorist?

Do you have an FBI file?

Do you have an FBI file?

So by now, you’re likely paranoid (like me), that you already have an FBI file just for attending events that promote veganism or environmentalism, signing petitions, leafleting, writing letters, or protesting (things that are in no way a crime but are an integral part of activism). I cannot say for sure, but I can tell you this: if you are from the state of Pennsylvania, like me, things are looking ok (so far).

The state of Pennsylvania has a website dedicated soley to terrorism awareness and protection. (If you’re not from PA, I would check to see if your state has a similar website.) In the introduction of the website, it is clarified that:

“it is important to remember that it is not illegal for an individual to belong to any group…

…even if other members of that group have committed terroristic acts…

…so long as the individual is not committing, conspiring to commit, or aiding others in committing criminal acts.

It is not what you say or think…
It is what you DO that defines one as a terrorist.”

Simply put, you are doing nothing wrong in sharing the beliefs of an organization that is labeled as “extremist” or “terrorist.” (Has anyone told the FBI that?) It’s not until you commit a crime in the name of that organization or ideal that you become a terrorist. (This is a point that is emphasized in bold on the website.) It is important to remember this, because the best thing you can do to battle the green scare is to know your rights.

The point of terrorism is to instill fear or intimidation in the hearts of the opposition. Most petitions and protests do not accomplish this.

Does this image scare you? It scares me, but not in the sense were talking about here.

Does this image scare you? It scares me, but not in the sense we're talking about here.

However, some things that are done by animal rights or environmentalist extremist groups (like ALF or ELF) do such as vandalism, break-ins, or arson, are illegal crimes. Will over at Green is the New Red seems to almost be forgetting this, claiming that because these “victims” didn’t hurt anybody, that they shouldn’t have been accused of terrorism. I beg to differ- just like the PA Aware site states, if you commit a crime in the name of a cause, that’s terrorism. But, if you’re staying within boundaries of the first amendment, such as letter writing, petition signing, website maintaining, and peaceful gatherings and protests, you are not breaking the law and therefore are not a terrorist.

Leave a Comment

Eco-Terrorism Part Three: Where Obama Stands

In a 2005 hearing on eco-terrorism, Senator Barack Obama stated:

“In America, we have the right to disagree over personal beliefs – whether they are religious, philosophical or moral – and to express those beliefs peaceably. We have the right to assemble and to demonstrate. But, we do not have the right to destroy others’ property and to commit acts of violence in the name of free speech.”

Obama supports our right to legally exercise free speech in the name of any cause.

“I hope we are not headed down the path of infringing on the ability of legitimate advocacy organizations to express their opinions and to raise funds in order to do so. I do not want Americans to equate groups that advocate violence with mainstream environmental organizations.”

Obama understands that not all animal rights (or environmental) activists seek to commit crimes or other disrespectful acts, and wants this fact to be recognized by legislators and law enforcers.

“So, while I appreciate the Chairman’s interest in these fringe groups, I urge the Committee to focus its attention on larger environmental threats, such as the dangerously high blood lead levels in hundreds of thousands of children. With all due respect, Mr. Chairman, I believe the Committee’s time would be better spent learning why EPA has not promulgated regulations to deal with lead paint in remodeled homes. Such an oversight hearing could have a significant impact on improving the lives of children all over the country.”

All I have to say is, way to go Barack!

And from his inaugural address:

“To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.”

Once again, I’m going to have to disagree with Green is the New Red. Will pessimistically blogged that he doesn’t think Obama will confront any of these eco-terrorism issues and that those who are looking to Obama as a “savior” are overly hopeful and will be greatly disappointed. (Forgive me, I closed the page and can’t seem to re-discover this particular blog entry). I won’t say I’m worshipping the man, but I have great confidence in his power and determination to facilitate change (and to right all the wrongs that occurred during the Bush administration). Just as the magazine cover above suggests, I truly do look to Obama as “A New Hope.”

Photo courtesy of Rolling Stone.

Comments (1)

Eco-terrorism Part Two: Domestic Terror

Ever since 2005, the FBI has cited eco-terrorism as the number one domestic terrorist threat. (Never mind the fact that there are probably more important and more threatening security issues for them to be worrying about.)

The FBI has gone so far as to send undercover spies to events as innocent as vegan potlucks. This scares me, because I’m not one to risk attending protests and things that might reasonably get me in trouble with the police or FBI, but a vegan potluck is something that I’m likely to attend. In fact, whenever two activists connect, the FBI has their antenna out.

In January of 2006, the 109th Congress signed the Animal Enterpreise Terrorism Act, and a couple of weeks ago, according to Green is the New Red, four California activists were convicted under it, with charges of (as quoted from GITNR):

  • Protesting outside the home of a University of California Berkeley professor. Some activists, “wearing bandanas to hide their faces, trespassed on his front yard, chanted slogans, and accused him of being a murderer because of his use of animals in research.”
  • At another protest, activists “marched, chanted, and chalked defamatory comments on the public sidewalks in front of the residences.”
  • At one protest, a group of five or six activists allegedly “attempted to forcibly enter the private home of a University of California researcher in Santa Cruz.”
  • Fliers titled “Murderers and torturers alive & well in Santa Cruz July 2008 edition” were found at a local coffee shop. They listed the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of several researchers. The fliers said “animal abusers everywhere beware we know where you live we know where you work we will never back down until you end your abuse.” The FBI says three of the defendants are tied to the “production and distribution of the fliers.”

Now, only the third charge is actually illegal, and even the “threat” in the flyers is too vague to prove anything. Now, I don’t disagree with the act in itself- the provisions seem to be reasonable, being based around things that are indeed illegal. I guess what strikes me as weird is that they felt like they had to create it at all. We already have laws in place against arson and theft. So I guess my biggest complaint about it is that it paints the picture of activists as being “bad guys” and encourages others to think the same.

What do you think?

Leave a Comment

Eco-terrorism Part One: An Introduction to The Green Scare

From Green is the New Reds Flickr

From Green is the New Red's Flickr

The Green scare is essentially the Red Scare of the new millennium, but this time, the attacks are directed towards two new groups that frequently challenge the status quo: environmentalists and animal activists. We know that some activists proceed in manners that are disrespectful such as vandalism and arson, while the majority of us simply and respectfully write letters, sign petitions, or attend peaceful protests. While we can easily make this separation, some members of society seen to be unable to make a distinction. It’s like how some perceive Islam to be all bad because the only exposure they’ve had to it is through the acts of extremists which are broadcast on the news.

The government, FBI, and special interest groups, whether or not they are able to see a difference, are trying to make us all out to be bad guys, no matter how we behave. Why is this? I suspect it’s because we challenge the status quo, and those in power only keep their level of power if the status quo is maintained. Or perhaps they’re just afraid of change.

The Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) is one organization that has been working to sell this idea, by taking out advertisements like the ones featured in this post. In fact, they’ve been trying to smear activist organizations (like the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine and the Humane Society) for more than 10 years! What would drive them to do that? Well, they are a special interest group sponsored by the companies that would benefit from the smearing of these activist organizations (for instance, meat, egg, and dairy producers).

(By the way, the NYSE hostage website doesn’t exist anymore.)

Ad taken out in the New York Times in 2005

Ad taken out in the New York Times in 2005

Labels of eco-terrorism have been taken so seriously that not even beloved children’s books and movies such as Charlotte’s Web and Hoot can escape the label of “eco-terrorist.” Someone please tell me what a menagerie of cunning barn animals has to do with terrorism?

Are you teaching your children to be little eco-terrorists?

Are you teaching your children to be little eco-terrorists?

For an in-depth explanation, check out this article at Green is the New Red.

Leave a Comment